| Hot News and New Stuff Forum Cars, Trucks, Boats Where other RC websites and RC media get their news |
 |

02-27-2013, 04:16 PM
|
 |
Online News Editor
|
|
Join Date: 05-02-2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 6,904
Thanks: 0
Thanked 38 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
|
MaxAmps.com High Discharge 150c 4000mah LiPos
Latest from MaxAmps.com:
Looking to save a little weight for your next race? Our new 4000mah 150C cells will do the trick. With the lower mah and the high discharge rate you are getting the best bang for the buck. Perfect for most 1/10th scale setups.
More information on these exciting packs can be found here: http://www.maxamps.com/products.php?cat=370

__________________
Trevor “Chilly” Duncan
Online News Editor
Radio Control Car Action
trevord@airage.com
rccanews@airage.com
http://www.rccaraction.com
|
| Sponsored Links |
|

02-27-2013, 07:42 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: 10-12-2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 969
Thanks: 12
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
|
Not so sure the inflated rating is in agreement with the 14 gauge wire your using. Also, aren't Deans connectors only rated for 50 amps or 100 amps at the most?
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to andystoybox For This Useful Post:
|
|

02-28-2013, 10:47 AM
|
 |
Certifiable RC Addict
|
|
Join Date: 04-16-2004
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
|
Maxamps True C rating is a burst rating unless something has changed recently. When I asked them to get an idea of what a continous rating, I was told to take half of the True C rating to get an estimate.
So these packs are 70C in a continous C rating world.
Maxamps used to have a breakdown on their website stating what True C rating meant and why the used it but I was told they removed it as it was confusing people.
Personally, Since pretty much everyone is used to a continuous rating, Seems the True C rating is more confusing, at least to me based on what I am seeing continously asked concerning their ratings.
|

02-28-2013, 05:32 PM
|
 |
3.14159265358979323846264
|
|
Join Date: 08-19-2002
Location: Wichita, ks
Posts: 10,066
Thanks: 60
Thanked 57 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
|
They'll say whatever they want to say, but to me it is and always has been an excuse to put a huge number on the pack so it would shine above everything else. It's good marketing for n00bs, not so much for those of us with more than 20 minutes of experience.
-Eric
|

02-28-2013, 06:20 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: 10-12-2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 969
Thanks: 12
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
|
Aww, c'mon. I almost bought the whole hype and i've been doing this hobby for at least 21 minutes. Give their marketing team a break. They just got there from Trinity.
|

03-01-2013, 05:46 PM
|
|
Certifiable RC Addict
|
|
Join Date: 10-14-2004
Posts: 1,369
Thanks: 12
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
|
Here is a thought. 150*4 = 600A. Assume the internal resistance is something like 1 milli-ohm (a reasonable number in my experience). The power dissipated in the pack at 600A will be 600^2 * 0.001 = 360W. It will not live long at that current. Lets try half that number. 300^2 * 0.001 = 90W. Still a lot of heat wrapped up in shrinkwrap. Don't think it would make an whole discharge at that current either. In all honesty, any C-rate that is above 35 or 40 is just pure marketing. The wire can't take it, the connector can't take it and what kind of motor and ESC could handle 4,440W of power (150C, 2S)?
|

03-01-2013, 07:57 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: 10-12-2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 969
Thanks: 12
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
|
Maybe they are going back to the Jensen radio amplifier days of WLS rating. They could make a shoebox amplifier make a 1000 watts but only When Lightning Strikes.
|

03-02-2013, 01:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: 09-09-2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 474
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chilly Duncan
you are getting the best bang for the buck.
|
Ahaha aha ahahahahahahahaha!!!!
|

03-02-2013, 09:25 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: 09-02-2009
Location: Questions?..Call 661-727-FAST
Posts: 490
Thanks: 6
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kufman
Here is a thought. 150*4 = 600A. Assume the internal resistance is something like 1 milli-ohm (a reasonable number in my experience). The power dissipated in the pack at 600A will be 600^2 * 0.001 = 360W. It will not live long at that current. Lets try half that number. 300^2 * 0.001 = 90W. Still a lot of heat wrapped up in shrinkwrap. Don't think it would make an whole discharge at that current either. In all honesty, any C-rate that is above 35 or 40 is just pure marketing. The wire can't take it, the connector can't take it and what kind of motor and ESC could handle 4,440W of power (150C, 2S)?
|
why don't they just put a 1.21 giggawatt burst rating on the label and get it over with...
__________________
Original Join date 2001, username "fastharry" 1300+ Posts, Racing since 1996, HPI Challenge winner. A Main Finalist HPI Worlds
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to fastharryDOTcom For This Useful Post:
|
|

03-04-2013, 03:46 PM
|
 |
Certifiable RC Addict
|
|
Join Date: 12-14-2000
Location: Sand Springs, OK, USA
Posts: 3,506
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastharryDOTcom
why don't they just put a 1.21 giggawatt burst rating on the label and get it over with...
|
And then offer a Flux Capacitor for the car so it can go fast enough to achieve time travel....
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Grizzbob For This Useful Post:
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
»Upcoming Races & Events |
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
|